Citation

Davis R. SSRN eLibrary 2020; 2020: e3722565.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Social Science Electronic Publishing)

DOI

10.2139/ssrn.3722565

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Republican political theory has long feared the tyranny of uncontrolled power. While maintaining the tradition's suspicions of concentrated power, neo-republicans regard the presence of a constitutionally limited political state as an essential constituent of nondomination. In this essay, I suggest that the summer protests of 2020 provide an occasion for scrutinizing philosophical idealization of the political state. If an image of the political state as a source of domination is placed alongside its usual image as the solution to domination, how would that revision affect neo-republican prescriptions? I consider this question specifically with respect to private ownership of firearms. This paper has two aims. First, I contend that private possession of firearms does not suffice for mutual domination. The neo-republican's premises are inadequate to build an argument for gun control. Second, I make a positive case that when the state becomes a dominating power or complicit in domination, private possession of firearms can potentially offer a valuable source of antipower.

Language: en

Keywords

Domination; Ethics; Guns; Neo-republicanism; Rights