Citation

Lindemann U, Schwickert L, Becker C, Gross M, Nolte R, Klenk J. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2021; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s40520-021-01832-z

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gait speed estimation using wearable inertial sensors during daily activities suffers from high complexity and inaccuracies in distance estimation when integrating acceleration signals. The aim of the study was to investigate the agreement between the methods of gait speed estimation using the persons' walk ratio (step-length/step-frequency relation) or step-frequency (number of steps per minute) and a "gold standard".

METHODS: For this cross-sectional validation study, 20 healthy community-dwelling older persons (mean age 72.1 years; 70% women) walked at slow, normal, and fast speed over an instrumented walkway (reference measure). Gait speed was calculated using the person's pre-assessed walk ratio. Furthermore, the duration of walking and number of steps were used for calculation.

RESULTS: The agreement between gait speed calculation using the walk ratio or step-frequency (adjusted to body height) and reference was r = 0.98 and r = 0.93, respectively. Absolute and relative mean errors of calculated gait speed using pre-assessed walk ratio ranged between 0.03-0.07 m/s and 1.97-4.17%, respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: After confirmation in larger cohorts of healthy community-dwelling older adults, the mean gait speed of single walking bouts during activity monitoring can be estimated using the person's pre-assessed walk ratio. Furthermore, the mean gait speed can be calculated using the step-frequency and body height and can be an additional parameter in stand-alone activity monitoring.

Language: en

Keywords

Older adults; Activity monitoring; Gait speed; Step-frequency; Walk ratio