SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Krasniuk S, Classen S, Morrow SA. Traffic Injury Prev. 2021; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/15389588.2021.1883008

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Drivers with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) may have an increased crash risk. However, the driving performance deficits that contribute to crashes are not fully understood. Based on the extant literature, adjustment to stimuli errors indicate failing an on-road assessment. This study examines whether adjustment to stimuli errors can detect the occurrence of collisions in a driving simulator in drivers with MS.

METHODS: As part of a quasi-experiment, 38 participants with MS and 21 participants without MS completed visual-cognitive and driving simulator assessments, which also recorded their adjustment to stimuli maneuvers. We quantified participants' adjustment to stimuli maneuvers via initial pedal reaction time (seconds), time to collision (seconds), mean speed (meters per second), and the occurrence of rear-end collisions (collide vs. did not collide) when a simulated vehicle cut across the lane in front of them.

RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses indicated that, compared to drivers without MS, those with MS had a shorter time to collision (OR=.04, p=.001, 95% CI= [.006,.27]) and a faster mean speed (OR= 1.32, p=.04, 95% CI= [1.01, 1.74]) which increased the odds of experiencing a rear-end collision. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses indicated that, for MS and control groups, time to collision (MS group = AUC=.94, p<.0001, Control group = AUC=.86, p<.0001) and mean speed (MS group = AUC=.76, p=.005, Control group = AUC =.78, p=.005) differentiated between participants who collided vs. did not collide. For drivers with MS, a time to collision of  ≤ 1.81 seconds (85% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 15% error rate), and a mean speed of  ≥ 7.83 meters per second (77% sensitivity, 76% specificity, 47% error rate) predicted the occurrence of collisions with the lowest error rate.

CONCLUSIONS: During a driving simulator assessment, adjustment to stimuli errors predicted the occurrence of rear-end collisions in drivers with MS (vs. without MS). Driving assessors may target scenarios that measure participants' adjustment to stimuli, via time to collision and mean speed, to make decisions about their visual-cognitive deficits and driving performance.


Language: en

Keywords

crash; computer simulation; driver behavior; Multiple sclerosis; screening

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print