Citation

Pyrhönen N, Bauvois G. Sociol. Inq. 2020; 90(4): 705-731.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Alpha Kappa Delta, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/soin.12339

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

As presidential elections carry the promise of distilling the contested and elusive "will of the people," the protracted media event intensifies the public demand for exposing the transgressions of the aspiring political elite. This expectation provides fertile ground for investigative journalism, ultrapartisan smear campaigns, fake news, and full-fledged conspiracy theories that are sometimes difficult to differentiate from one another in a hybridized media space. We compare three unique conspiracy stories--Macronleaks, Pizzagate, and Voter fraud--emerging during the previous French and American elections. We assess the divergent strategies of social action that contribute to the stories' dissimilar patterns for intervening the political news cycle with the "reinformative toolkit" and deconstruct the common conspiratorial "masterplot" for "reinforming" the public. Focusing on online "produsers"--media users functioning as (dis)information producers--we analyze how the grassroots level participated in shaping the conspiracy stories' synopses and channeling news-framed, conspiratory content between mainstream and "countermedia" outlets.

Language: en