Citation

Imperiale AJ, Vanclay F. Disaster Prev. Manage. 2020; 29(4): 541-555.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Emerald Group Publishing)

DOI

10.1108/DPM-11-2019-0336

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

PURPOSE We consider what happened in the initial reconstruction interventions following the 6 April 2009 earthquake in L'Aquila (Italy). Using the disaster risk reduction and resilience paradigm, we discuss the cognitive and interactional failures of top-down approaches, and we analyse the main constraints to enacting inclusive social learning and socially-sustainable transformation and building back better more resilient communities in post-disaster reconstruction.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH Our evidence comes from participant observation, action anthropology and analytic auto-ethnography conducted during the reconstruction phase following the L'Aquila earthquake.

FINDINGS were triangulated with document analysis, media analysis and retrospective interviewing conducted in 2013 and 2017.

FINDINGS The shift from civil defence to civil protection did not bring any advance in disaster management and development practice in terms of DRR and resilience. The militaristic command-and-control approach, which is still in vogue among civil protection systems, means that local political leaders become the civil protection authorities in a disaster area. As in the L'Aquila case, this exacerbates local social and environmental risks and impacts, inhibits local communities from learning and restricts them from participating in post-disaster interventions.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE Most previous commentary on disaster recovery and reconstruction following the L'Aquila earthquake has focussed on the top-down approach carried out by the national government and the Italian Department of Civil Protection (DCP). This paper is unique in that it sheds light on how the command-and-control approach was also implemented by local authority figures and on how this undermined building back better more resilient communities.

Language: en

Keywords

Command and control; Disaster management; Disaster risk reduction; Earthquakes; Reconstruction; Resilience