Citation

Wallis G, Chatziastros A, Bülthoff H. Curr. Biol. 2002; 12(4): 295-299.

Affiliation

Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, Tubingen, Germany. gwallis@hms.uq.edu.au

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

11864569

Abstract

Some motor tasks can be completed, quite literally, with our eyes shut. Most people can touch their nose without looking or reach for an object after only a brief glance at its location. This distinction leads to one of the defining questions of movement control: is information gleaned prior to starting the movement sufficient to complete the task (open loop), or is feedback about the progress of the movement required (closed loop)? One task that has commanded considerable interest in the literature over the years is that of steering a vehicle, in particular lane-correction and lane-changing tasks. Recent work has suggested that this type of task can proceed in a fundamentally open loop manner, with feedback mainly serving to correct minor, accumulating errors. This paper reevaluates the conclusions of these studies by conducting a new set of experiments in a driving simulator. We demonstrate that, in fact, drivers rely on regular visual feedback, even during the well-practiced steering task of lane changing. Without feedback, drivers fail to initiate the return phase of the maneuver, resulting in systematic errors in final heading. The results provide new insight into the control of vehicle heading, suggesting that drivers employ a simple policy of "turn and see," with only limited understanding of the relationship between steering angle and vehicle heading.

Language: en