Citation

Lyon C, Persaud BN, Merritt D, Cheung J. Transp. Res. Rec. 2020; 2674(12): 505-514.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0361198120957327

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The intent of the study was to fill a knowledge void by developing high quality crash modification factors (CMFs) and benefit/cost (B/C) ratios for high friction surface treatment (HFST). The state-of-the-art empirical Bayes (EB) before-after methodology was applied to evaluate the effects of this treatment on crashes of various types using data from West Virginia (curve sites), Pennsylvania (curve sites), Kentucky (curve and ramp sites), and Arkansas (ramp sites). The results for curve sites generally indicate substantial and highly significant safety benefits. This is especially so for the primary crash types targeted by HFST programs: run-off-road, wet road, and head-on side-swipe opposite direction crashes (HOSSOD). The results for ramp sites were inconsistent, with substantial benefits for all crashes and injury crashes for Kentucky, negligible effects for these crashes in Arkansas, and substantial and highly significant reductions in wet weather crashes in both states. A disaggregate analysis of the CMF results for curve sites indicated a logical and consistent relationship between CMFs and three variables: friction improvement, traffic volume, and expected crash frequency before treatment. These variables, and an innovative methodology, were used in developing crash modification functions (CMFunctions) that can be applied to determine where, and under what conditions, the treatment can be used most effectively. Such functions are typically not provided for the vast majority of treatments for which CMFs are available, so, in itself, developing them is a significant contribution of this research.

Language: en