Citation

Ahmad J. Crit. Stud. Terror. 2020; 13(4): 568-590.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/17539153.2020.1810987

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article analyses the imagined threat posed by the Islamic State in the aftermath of the November 13th Paris attacks and during the build-up to the December 2nd 2015 House of Commons vote to extend U.K. airstrikes to Syria. Combining Political Communications and International Relations approaches to framing analysis, and focusing on Britain's three main television news providers (BBC, ITV and Channel 4), it seeks to question (1) how the Islamic State is framed, (2) who shapes those frames, and (3) what consequences arise from adopting certain ways of seeing and speaking over others? The analysis identifies three competing frames (labelled here as the "(Para)Military", the "Elusive" and the "Extremist" frames), and their main advocates, and shows how, ultimately, U.K. news media tend to support an "elite"-centred understanding of the threat, thus legitimising calls for extending airstrikes into Syria. In so doing, the article provides two contributions to knowledge: first, empirical, by generating substantive new insight into the way the Islamic State was portrayed in the days and weeks following the Paris attacks, and in particular who shapes those portrayals; and, second, conceptual, via its blending of Political Communications and International Relations approaches to framing and their consequences.

Language: en

Keywords

Framing; Islamic State; political possibility; television; terrorism; visual/verbal representation