Citation

Cox DJ, Merkel RL, Penberthy JK, Kovatchev B, Hankin CS. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2004; 43(3): 269-275.

Affiliation

Department of Psychiatric Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. djc4f@virginia.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, American Academy of Child Adolescent Psychiatry, Publisher Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

15076259

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at high risk for driving accidents. One dose of methylphenidate (MPH) improves simulator driving performances of ADHD-diagnosed adolescents at 1.5 hours post-dose. However, little is known about the effects of different MPH delivery profiles on driving performance throughout the day. METHOD: This randomized, crossover, single-blind study compared osmotic, controlled-release oral system (OROS) MPH (Concerta) given q.d. to immediate-release MPH (Ritalin) given in equal doses t.i.d. on driving performance among six male ADHD-diagnosed adolescent drivers aged 16 to 19 years. Under each treatment condition, participants were maintained on their medication dosage for 7 days, then drove a sophisticated driving simulator at 2 p.m., 5 p.m., 8 p.m., and 11 p.m. The primary outcome measure was each participant's computer-quantified Impaired Driving Score (IDS). RESULTS: IDS worsened in the evenings for participants receiving MPH t.i.d. but remained stable when they received once-daily OROS MPH. Participants performed significantly better when receiving OROS MPH q.d. compared with MPH t.i.d. (F = 9.3, df = 1, p =.004). When MPH was given t.i.d., IDS significantly worsened beginning at 8 p.m. compared to OROS MPH (p =.01). CONCLUSIONS: Participants demonstrated significantly less variability and better driving performance when receiving OROS MPH q.d. compared to MPH t.i.d., particularly in the evenings.

Language: en