SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Rehm J, Room RGW. Nord. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 2017; 34(4): 330-341.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Walter de Gruyter)

DOI

10.1177/1455072517704795

PMID

32934495 PMCID

Abstract

Aims: To examine the cultural impact on the diagnosis of alcohol-use disorders using European countries as examples.

Design: Narrative review.

Results: There are strong cultural norms guiding heavy drinking occasions and loss of control. These norms not only indicate what drinking behaviour is acceptable, but also whether certain behaviours can be reported or not. As modern diagnostic systems are based on lists of mostly behavioural criteria, where alcohol-use disorders are defined by a positive answer on at least one, two or three of these criteria, culture will inevitably co-determine how many people will get a diagnosis. This explains the multifold differences in incidence and prevalence of alcohol-use disorders, even between countries where the average drinking levels are similar. Thus, the incidence and prevalence of alcohol-use disorders as assessed by surveys or rigorous application of standardised instruments must be judged as measuring social norms as well as the intended mental disorder.

Conclusions: Current practice to measure alcohol-use disorders based on a list of culture-specific diagnostic criteria results in incomparability in the incidence, prevalence or disease burden between countries. For epidemiological purposes, a more grounded definition of diagnostic criteria seems necessary, which could probably be given by using heavy drinking over time.


Language: en

Keywords

culture; alcohol; measurement; alcohol-use disorders; universality

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print