Citation

Berglund C, Souleimanov EA. Dyn. Asymm. Confl. 2020; 13(1): 87-98.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/17467586.2019.1680855

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In the second half of the 1990s, the label "asymmetric" conflict rose to prominence among scholars and strategists, as a term for capturing the rising challenge that violent non-state actors posed to the liberal world order. However, the concept soon became a catch-phrase for a range of disparate phenomena, and other buzzwords arose to describe the threats of concern to decision-makers. Conceptual confusion beset the field. This article dissects the notion of asymmetric conflicts, and distinguishes between asymmetries involving differences in (1) status, (2) capabilities, or (3) strategies between belligerents. It argues that "asymmetric" conflicts can take numerous forms depending on the combination of differences present, and offers a blue-print for keeping track of the meaning of this concept in the hope of bringing greater precision to future debates.

Language: en

Keywords

Asymmetric conflict; concept structure; insurgencies; non-state actor; terrorism