Citation

Soble JR, Alverson WA, Phillips JI, Critchfield EA, Fullen C, O'Rourke JJF, Messerly J, Highsmith JM, Bailey KC, Webber TA, Marceaux JC. Psychol. Inj. Law 2020; 13(1): 44-56.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s12207-019-09370-w

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Mirroring clinical guidelines, recent Performance Validity Test (PVT) research emphasizes using ≥ 2 criterion PVTs to optimally identify validity groups when validating/cross-validating PVTs; however, even with multiple measures, the effect of which specific PVTs are used as criterion measures remains incompletely explored. This study investigated the accuracy of varying two-PVT combinations for establishing validity status and how adding a third PVT or applying more liberal failure cut-scores affects overall false-positive (FP)/-negative (FN) rates. Clinically referred veterans (N = 114; 30% clinically identified as invalid) completing a six-PVT protocol as during their evaluation were included. Concordance rates were calculated across all possible two-and three-PVT combinations at conservative and liberal cutoffs. Two-PVT combinations classified 72-91% of valid (0-4% FPs) and 17-74% of invalid (0-40% FNs) cases, and three-PVT combinations classified 67-86% of valid (0-6% FPs) and 57-97% of invalid (0-24% FNs) at conservative cutoffs. Liberal cutoffs classified 53-86% of valid (0-15% FPs) and 39-82% of invalid (0-30% FNs) cases for two-PVT combinations and 46-75% of valid (3-27% FPs) and 60-97% of invalid (0-17% FNs) cases for three-PVT combinations. Irrespective of whether a two-or three-PVT combination or conservative/liberal cutoffs were used, many valid and invalid cases failed only one PVT (3-68%).Two-PVT combinations produced high FNs and were less accurate than three-PVTs for detecting invalid cases, though variable accuracy was found within both types of combinations based on the specific PVTs in the combination. Thus, both PVT quantity and quality are important for accurate validity classification in research studies to ensure reliability and replicability of findings. Applying more liberal cutoffs yielded increased sensitivity, but with generally higher FPs yielding problematic specificity, particularly for three-PVT combinations.

Language: en