Citation

Wong B. Soc. Theory Pract. 2020; 46(1): 231-255.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Florida State University Center for Social Philosophy)

DOI

10.5840/soctheorpract2019123174

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Political liberals usually assume the coercion account, which argues that state actions should be publicly justified because they coerce citizens. Recently some critics object this account for it overlooks that some policies are non-coercive but still require public justification. My article argues that, instead of understanding coercion as particular laws or policies, it should be understood as the exercise of collective political power that shapes the basic structure. This revised coercion account explains why those ostensibly non-coercive policies are in fact coercive. Moreover, I argue that the alternative accounts suggested by critics fail, unless they assume the revised coercion account.

Language: en