SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Sheikh M, Hosseini HA. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2020; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/09593985.2020.1771799

PMID

32482118

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the relationship between spatiotemporal gait variability and falls self-efficacy after chronic stroke while taking into account the effect of some known potential confounders including fall numbers and gait velocity.

METHODS: Participants (n = 62) walked at their preferred speed to calculate gait variability for stride time, stride length, swing time, and double-support percent. The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) assessed falls self-efficacy. The linear regression tests were used for statistical analysis. Age, sex, time since stroke, paretic side, motor impairments, fall numbers, and gait velocity were considered as independent variables.

RESULTS: Increased FES-I score was related to higher stride time variability (R2 = 0.65, F(8,53) = 15.44, P < .05). Increased FES-I was associated with higher stride length variability (R2 = 0.42, F(6,55) = 8.44, P < .05). However, further adjustment on gait velocity and fall numbers made the association non-significant (R2 = 0.41, F(8,53) = 6.4, P > .05). No significant relationship was identified between FES-I and swing time (R2 = 0.08, F(8,53) = 0.39, P > .05) and FES-I and double-support percent variability (R2 = 0.04, F(8,53) = 0.67, P > .05).

CONCLUSION: The results indicate that increased FES-I score may be related to increased stride variability post stroke.


Language: en

Keywords

accidental falls; Fear; gait; stroke

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print