SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Berg L, Farbenblum B, Kintominas A. Anti-Traffick. Rev. 2020; 14: 47-66.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (GAATW))

DOI

10.14197/atr.201220144

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Multinational businesses are facing mounting pressure to identify and address risks of exploitation, trafficking and modern slavery in their supply chains. Digital worker reporting tools present unprecedented opportunities for lead firms to reach out directly to hard-to-reach workers for feedback on their working conditions via their mobile phone. These new technologies promise an efficient and cost-effective way to cut through the complexity of global production, gathering unmediated data on working conditions directly from workers at scale. As the market for these tools grows, this paper contextualises their emergence within the broader political economy of supply chain governance. It presents three sets of concerns about their use that must be addressed by businesses, investors, donors and governments that develop or utilise these tools. First, the quality of data gathered by these tools may be inadequate to reliably inform decision-making. Second, global brands may gather large quantities of worker data to identify legal, reputational and financial risks without addressing structural causes of exploitation or delivering outcomes for workers. Third, large scale collection of data from workers creates new risks for workers' wellbeing and safety.

Keywords: Human trafficking;


Language: en

Keywords

labour exploitation; migrant worker; modern slavery; supply chain; technology; worker voice

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print