Citation

Fansher AK, Zedaker SB. J. Interpers. Violence 2020; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

University of Houston-Victoria, TX, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0886260520916831

PMID

32401140

Abstract

An extensive amount of research has been devoted to understanding rape myths, especially in the context of sexual attitudes. Few studies have examined sexual actions as a correlate of rape myth acceptance (RMA). As such, this study utilizes the Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (IRMA) and its four distinct subscales to examine adherence to rape myths and an individual's view of sex and sexuality in a sample of 1,310 college students. The IRMA was included in its entirety and separated into its four subscales: "She asked for it," "He didn't mean to," "It wasn't really rape," and "She lied." Results indicated that the most impactful variables for all four subscales were adversarial heterosexual beliefs, stereotypical gender beliefs, and being male. The main implications of this study pertain to implementation of programming. Intervention programming should focus on younger males due to their increased adherence to certain rape myths. Furthermore, programs that address not only rape myths but also other traditional and negative belief systems should be employed.

RESULTS of this study lend support to the supposition that it is not necessarily individual characteristics that have a large effect on RMA but is instead a strong adherence to traditional belief systems.

Language: en

Keywords

IRMA; adversarial heterosexual beliefs; rape myths; sexual history; stereotypical gender beliefs