CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Johnson L, Cusano JL, Nikolova K, Steiner JJ, Postmus JL. J. Interpers. Violence 2020; ePub(ePub): ePub. |
|
Affiliation |
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2020, SAGE Publishing) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
32389054 |
|
Abstract |
Advocates in the field of intimate partner violence (IPV) have started to more actively engage survivors around their own perceptions of their lethality risk, as well as assist them in developing strategies for reducing and managing risk related to reassault and intimate partner homicide (IPH). Although research has examined the risk factors most associated with risk and utilized this information in the development and validation of risk assessment tools to be used with survivors, less is known about which indicators survivors most associate with lethality risk. This study aims to fill this gap by examining which risk indicators IPV survivors associate with fatality risk. Classification and regression tree analyses were used to differentiate between women who believed their partners were capable of killing them and those who did not. Data on a sample of 213 survivors of IPV used in this analysis were collected as part of a larger study in which a risk assessment instrument was piloted across four counties within New Jersey in 2016. More than three fourths of participants believed that their abuser was capable of killing them. Alhough the majority of survivors in the study felt as though their abusers were capable of killing them, there was variation in how survivors prioritized risk indicators. Factors associated with fatality risk included: (a) prior homicide threats; (b) whether the abusers had control over survivors' daily activities; (c) abusers' access to a gun; and (d) abusers' drug use. Language: en |
|
Keywords |
assessment; domestic violence; homicide; perceptions of domestic violence |