Citation

Yanos PT, DeLuca JS, Roe D, Lysaker PH. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 288: e112950.

Affiliation

Richard L Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States; Indiana University School of Medicine, IN, United States.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112950

PMID

32361335

Abstract

The "Illness Identity" model proposed that self-stigma impacts hope and self-esteem and subsequently leads to a cascade of negative effects on outcomes related to recovery among people diagnosed with severe mental illnesses. The purpose of the present review is to take stock of research support for the model. The citation index SCOPUS was reviewed for all papers published in peer-reviewed journals in English between 2010 and 2019 citing one of the initial 3 articles discussing the model: 111 studies met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The most frequently tested, and supported, aspects of the model were relationships between self-stigma and self-esteem, hope, psychiatric symptoms and social relationships. Least frequently studied areas were relationships with suicide, avoidant coping, treatment adherence and vocational functioning, although they were supported in the majority of studies. The "insight paradox" was also tested in a relatively small number of studies, with mixed results.

FINDINGS were robust to geographic location of study, method, and subpopulation studied.

FINDINGS indicate that a large body of research has tested, and largely supported, the various components of the Illness Identity model, although some components need further investigation and there is a need for more comprehensive tests of the model.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Language: en

Keywords

Identity; Insight; Recovery; Self-stigma