Citation

Goldsmith LP, Smith JG, Clarke G, Anderson K, Lomani J, Turner K, Gillard S. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20(1): e185.

Affiliation

Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group - BMC)

DOI

10.1186/s12888-020-02581-5

PMID

32326915

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The UK mental health system is stretched to breaking point. Individuals presenting with mental health problems wait longer at the ED than those presenting with physical concerns and finding a bed when needed is difficult - 91% of psychiatric wards are operating at above the recommended occupancy rate. To address the pressure, a new type of facility - psychiatric decision units (also known as mental health decision units) - have been introduced in some areas. These are short-stay facilities, available upon referral, targeted to help individuals who may be able to avoid an inpatient admission or lengthy ED visit. To advance knowledge about the effectiveness of this service for this purpose, we will examine the effect of the service on the mental health crisis care pathway over a 4-year time period; the 2 years proceeding and following the introduction of the service. We use aggregate service level data of key indicators of the performance of this pathway.

METHODS: Data from four mental health Trusts in England will be analysed using an interrupted time series (ITS) design with the primary outcomes of the rate of (i) ED psychiatric presentations and (ii) voluntary admissions to mental health wards. This will be supplemented with a synthetic control study with the same primary outcomes, in which a comparable control group is generated for each outcome using a donor pool of suitable National Health Service Trusts in England. The methods are well suited to an evaluation of an intervention at a service delivery level targeting population-level health outcome and the randomisation or 'trialability' of the intervention is limited. The synthetic control study controls for national trends over time, increasing our confidence in the results. The study has been designed and will be carried out with the involvement of service users and carers.

DISCUSSION: This will be the first formal evaluation of psychiatric decision units in England. The analysis will provide estimates of the effect of the decision units on a number of important service use indicators, providing much-needed information for those designing service pathways. TRIAL REGISTRATION: primary registry: isrctn.com Identifying number: ISRCTN77588384 Link: Date of registration in primary registry: 27/02/2020. PRIMARY SPONSOR: St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, SW17 ORE. Primary contact: Joe Montebello.

Language: en

Keywords

Interrupted time series; Mental health crisis; Psychiatric decision unit, emergency department, crisis management, inpatient alternatives, psychiatric crisis; Service parameters; Service pathways; Synthetic control