Citation

Greason M. J. Bioeth. Inq. 2020; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

St Thomas University, 51 Dineen Drive., BMH 309, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5G3, Canada. mgreason@stu.ca.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Bioethics Centre, University of Otago)

DOI

10.1007/s11673-020-09974-x

PMID

32297016

Abstract

There are studies on the normative ethical frameworks used by long-term care staff and studies proposing how staff should reason, but few studies explore how staff actually reason. This study reports on the ethical reasoning process and experiences of moral distress of long-term care staff in the provision of social care. Seven interdisciplinary focus groups were conducted with twenty front-line staff. Staff typically did not have difficulty determining the ethical decision and/or action; however, they frequently experience moral distress. To manage these experiences of moral distress in making ethical decisions, staff 1) comply with being told what to do out of fear of consequences, 2) defer decisions to family, 3) "have a meeting," 4) socialization into and acceptance of workplace culture.

FINDINGS suggest that to better understand how and why staff make ethical decisions and improve quality and ethical care, we must explore the interaction between front-line practice and organizational and public policy.

Language: en

Keywords

Empirical ethics; Ethical reasoning; Ethics policy; Long-term care; Moral distress; Quality care