SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Mulvey KL, Gönültaş S, Richardson CB. Cogn. Sci. 2020; 44(4): e12833.

Affiliation

Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness, Pennsylvania State University.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/cogs.12833

PMID

32274859

Abstract

Research has documented that individuals consider outcomes, intentions, and transgressor negligence when making morally relevant judgments (Nobes, Panagiotaki, & Engelhardt, 2017). However, less is known about whether individuals attend to both victim and transgressor negligence in their evaluations. The current study measured 3- to 6-year-olds (N = 70), 7- to 12-year-olds (N = 54), and adults' (N = 97, ages 18-25 years) moral judgments about scenarios in which an accidental transgression occurred involving property damage or physical harm. Participants were either assigned to conditions where the victim or the transgressor was negligent.

RESULTS revealed attention to negligence among all participants across a range of different moral judgment measures (including acceptability judgments, punishment judgments, and attributions of blame), with age-related increases in attention to negligence evident.

RESULTS provide novel evidence that children and adults consider not just outcomes and intentions, but also the role of negligence in both victims and transgressors, when making social decisions.

© 2020 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.


Language: en

Keywords

Development; Intention; Moral judgments; Negligence; Social-cognition

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print