Citation

Bruckner DW. Soc. Theory Pract. 2018; 44(2): 149-177.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Florida State University Center for Social Philosophy)

DOI

10.5840/soctheorpract20185834

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Hugh LaFollette, Jeff McMahan, and David DeGrazia endorse the most popular and convincing argument for the strict regulation of firearms in the U.S. The argument is based on the extensive, preventable harm caused by firearms. DeGrazia offers another compelling argument based on the rights of those threatened by firearms. My thesis is a conditional: if these usual arguments for gun control succeed, then alcoholic beverages should be controlled much more strictly than they are, possibly to the point of prohibition. The argument for this thesis involves developing a careful analogy between firearms and alcohol and defending the analogy against objections.

Keywords: Applied Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy Social and Political Philosophy

Language: en