SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Green R, Gray RM, Bryant J, Rance J, MacLean S. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Criminol. 2020; 53(1): 137-154.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0004865819879736

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Youth justice policies in Australia feature an overall welfare-oriented approach and an emphasis on diverting young people away from the justice system. Nevertheless, some young people, particularly those with complex needs, are incarcerated at a young age and are at greater risk of poor outcomes. This paper explores barriers to the use of diversion options by police through analysis of in-depth interviews with 25 police staff. Consistent with the previous literature, role constraints, workload and lack of specialist knowledge were discussed. This paper explores the interplay of these factors with values, beliefs and expectations about young offenders - many of which were framed by experiences of adversarial encounters with young people and damaged faith in the system to rehabilitate. Naturalistic decision-making scholarship is drawn on to identify the potential role of 'schemas' in police use of discretion and of practical strategies that may support welfare and rehabilitation-oriented police practice with young people.

Keyword: Juvenile justice


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print