Citation

Curtis A, Miller P, Palmer D, Warren I, McFarlane E, Hudson K. Addict. Res. Theory 2017; 25(2): 163-167.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/16066359.2016.1237632

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The problems associated with alcohol consumption in or around licensed premises in the nighttime economy are extensive. One intervention designed to address these problems is drink restrictions. The aim of the current study is to gain different key stakeholder perspectives on drink restriction interventions, including their ability to reduce alcohol-related harms.

METHOD: This study involves an analysis of key stakeholder perspectives on the introduction of drink restrictions. Interviews were conducted with 23 key stakeholders, including venue licencees, security, and police from Newcastle, Australia. Drink restrictions, including limits on shots and number of drinks, were part of a mandatory set of interventions, which were implemented as a result of legislative change in New South Wales. As such, key stakeholders were able to provide insight into the implementation and practicality of the restrictions. All interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS: Overall, key stakeholders were mixed in their support for drink restrictions, particularly because of the issues associated with customer preloading and practicality of enforcement. Stakeholders remained unconvinced of the impact of the restrictions on reducing harm.

CONCLUSIONS: Key stakeholders believe that drink restrictions would almost certainly be more likely to reduce alcohol-related harm in the nighttime economy as part of a larger intervention. However, it is unclear how much impact they have as a standalone harm reduction measure.

Language: en

Keywords

alcohol-related harm; drink restrictions; Intervention; nighttime economy; stakeholder interviews