SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Allen JG, Newmark GL. Transp. Res. Rec. 2020; 2674(1): 217-227.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0361198119900499

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

North American commuter railroads run their trains largely on tracks shared with freights (and in the northeastern US, often shared with intercity passenger trains). This sharing makes commuter rail relatively affordable to implement. However, as freight traffic grows, so does the potential for delays. If freight and commuter operations affect each other's performance, it may be necessary to consider separation measures, not adding to the existing shared-track capacity. Temporal separation can work on low-volume operations. Busier lines may require physical separation, which can be implemented in several forms for trunk lines (grade separation at junctions, freight bypass, partial trunk line separation, and full trunk line separation), as well as physical separation in downtown areas. This article identifies these separation options, describes their attributes, presents representative examples, and outlines criteria for evaluation.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print