SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Casper DM, Card NA, Barlow C. J. Adolesc. 2020; 80: 41-52.

Affiliation

The University of Alabama, 226 Child Development Research Center, Box 870160-0160, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.012

PMID

32062169

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis includes 46 studies including 35,468 adolescents (M age = 12.4 years) with a mean sample ages between 10 and 17 years. Just over half of the studies include samples drawn from the U.S. with the remaining samples representing 11 different countries.

METHOD: We examined the magnitude of overlap between relational aggression and relational victimization and, using infrequently used semipartial correlations as effect sizes, we examined unique associations of each with peer acceptance, peer rejection, popularity, and positive friendship characteristics.

RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a strong intercorrelation between relational aggression and victimization (r‾ = .48). We found no mean level gender difference in experiences of relational aggression or relational victimization. Relational aggression is positively associated with popularity; victimization is negatively associated with peer acceptance and friendship characteristics. Both, aggression and victimization are positively associated with rejection. We explored method of assessment as a potential source of variability of effect sizes as well as potential publication bias. Future research and implications for prevention and intervention are discussed.

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


Language: en

Keywords

Meta-Analysis; Peer correlates; Relational aggression; Relational victimization

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print