|
Affiliation
|
Department of Community Health Sciences, Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, TRW, 4th Floor, Room 4D66, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. |
|
Abstract
|
BACKGROUND: Suicide is a leading cause of death, particularly in younger persons, and this results in tremendous years of life lost.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of recurrent neural networks, one-dimensional convolutional neural networks, and gradient boosted trees, with logistic regression and feedforward neural networks.
METHODS: The modeling dataset contained 3548 persons that died by suicide and 35,480 persons that did not die by suicide between 2000 and 2016. 101 predictors were selected, and these were assembled for each of the 40 quarters (10 years) prior to the quarter of death, resulting in 4040 predictors in total for each person. Model configurations were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation.
RESULTS: The optimal recurrent neural network model configuration (AUC: 0.8407), one-dimensional convolutional neural network configuration (AUC: 0.8419), and XGB model configuration (AUC: 0.8493) all outperformed logistic regression (AUC: 0.8179). In addition to superior discrimination, the optimal XGB model configuration also achieved superior calibration.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the models developed in this study showed promise, further research is needed to determine the performance limits of statistical and machine learning models that quantify suicide risk, and to develop prediction models optimized for implementation in clinical settings. It appears that the XGB model class is the most promising in terms of discrimination, calibration, and computational expense. LIMITATIONS: Many important predictors are not available in administrative data and this likely places a limit on how well prediction models developed with administrative data can perform.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Language: en |