SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gaudet JR, Lievers WB, Fairgrieve SI. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019; 307: e110123.

Affiliation

Department of Forensic Science, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 2C6, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110123

PMID

31951950

Abstract

Forensic investigators commonly interpret bone fracture patterns to estimate the force required to generate that trauma. Unfortunately, these estimates are limited to qualitative values such as "mild", "moderate" or "extreme" force. This work presents a new experimental forensic device developed to simulate blunt- and sharp-force trauma injuries, while recording the forces and velocities involved, so that a more quantitative relationship between force and trauma can be established. The machine design is described in some detail, its capabilities are outlined, and the results of the commissioning and validation tests are presented. Preliminary results for both blunt- and sharp-force testing of porcine ribs, conducted at 3.8m/s, indicate the average peak force (733±95N versus 392±73N), average force (334±49N versus 101±24N), and work (2.34±0.26J versus 0.68±0.09J) are significantly higher in the blunt case. The experimental data generated by this instrumented device will allow forensic investigators to create a better quantitative link between incident conditions (velocity, force, work) and the resulting fracture patterns.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Blunt-force trauma; Instrumented device; Porcine ribs; Sharp-force trauma

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print