SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Martin-Lemoyne V, Vincent C, Boutros GEH, Routhier F, Gagnon DH. Clin. Biomech. 2019; 73: 28-34.

Affiliation

Pathokinesiology Laboratory, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CRIR) of Greater Montreal, Institut universitaire sur la réadaptation en déficience physique de Montréal, CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada; School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: dany.gagnon.2@umontreal.ca.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.12.022

PMID

31923779

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury are at risk of developing secondary upper extremity musculoskeletal impairments. The use of a mobility assistance dog may represent a way to mitigate this risk. This study aims to compare upper extremity muscular effort in this population when propelling a manual wheelchair on tiled and carpeted surfaces with and without the assistance of a dog.

METHOD: Thirteen adults with a spinal cord injury propelled their manual wheelchairs at a self-selected natural speed over a 10-meter distance on tiled abrasive and carpeted floors with and without their ADMob. Surface electromyography of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, biceps, and triceps was recorded and normalized against its maximal value extracted from maximal voluntary contractions. Time needed to perform each task was also computed.

FINDINGS: The forward pull provided by the dog significantly and meaningfully reduced the muscular effort when propelling on the tiled floor and, even more so, on carpeted surfaces for the pectoralis major (-27.0% and -59.2%), the anterior deltoid (-54.8% and -92.4%), the biceps (-53.9% and -57.6%), and the triceps (-45.7% and -67.3%). The time needed to travel the 10-meter distance was also significantly and meaningfully reduced on the tiled and carpeted surfaces (-21.9% and -30.3%, respectively).

INTERPRETATION: The provision of a mobility assistance dog represents a viable rehabilitation alternative to minimizing upper extremity muscular effort while also optimizing speed during propulsion in manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury.

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


Language: en

Keywords

Assistive technology; Paraplegia; Rehabilitation; Shoulder; Task performance and analysis; Wheelchair

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print