Citation

Rosellini AJ, Liu S, Anderson GN, Sbi S, Tung ES, Knyazhanskaya E. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2019; 121: 189-196.

Affiliation

Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.12.006

PMID

31864158

Abstract

A growing literature is utilizing machine learning methods to develop psychopathology risk algorithms that can be used to inform preventive intervention. However, efforts to develop algorithms for internalizing disorder onset have been limited. The goal of this study was to utilize prospective survey data and ensemble machine learning to develop algorithms predicting adult onset internalizing disorders. The data were from Waves 1-2 of the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (n = 34,653). Outcomes were incident occurrence of DSM-IV generalized anxiety, panic, social phobia, depression, and mania between Waves 1-2. In total, 213 risk factors (features) were operationalized based on their presence/occurrence at the time of or before Wave 1. For each of the five internalizing disorder outcomes, super learning was used to generate a composite algorithm from several linear and non-linear classifiers (e.g., random forests, k-nearest neighbors). AUCs achieved by the cross-validated super learner ensembles were in the range of 0.76 (depression) to 0.83 (mania), and were higher than AUCs achieved by the individual algorithms. Individuals in the top 10% of super learner predicted risk accounted for 37.97% (depression) to 53.39% (social anxiety) of all incident cases. Thus, the algorithms achieved acceptable-to-excellent prediction accuracy with a high concentration of incident cases observed among individuals predicted to be highest risk. In parallel with the development of effective preventive interventions, further validation, expansion, and dissemination of algorithms predicting internalizing disorder onset/trajectory could be of great value.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Language: en

Keywords

Algorithm; Anxiety; Incidence; Machine learning; Mood; Risk score