SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yates AG, Anthony DC, Ruitenberg MJ, Couch Y. Front. Immunol. 2019; 10: e2723.

Affiliation

Acute Stroke Programme, RDM-Investigative Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Frontiers Research Foundation)

DOI

10.3389/fimmu.2019.02723

PMID

31824504

PMCID

PMC6879545

Abstract

Inflammation following traumatic injury to the central nervous system (CNS) persists long after the primary insult and is known to exacerbate cell death and worsen functional outcomes. Therapeutic interventions targeting this inflammation have been unsuccessful, which has been attributed to poor bioavailability owing to the presence of blood-CNS barrier. Recent studies have shown that the magnitude of the CNS inflammatory response is dependent on systemic inflammatory events. The acute phase response (APR) to CNS injury presents an alternative strategy to modulating the secondary phase of injury. However, the communication pathways between the CNS and the periphery remain poorly understood. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane bound nanoparticles that are regulators of intercellular communication. They are shed from cells of the CNS including microglia, astrocytes, neurons and endothelial cells, and are able to cross the blood-CNS barrier, thus providing an attractive candidate for initiating the APR after acute CNS injury. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current evidence that EVs play a critical role in the APR following CNS injuries.

Copyright © 2019 Yates, Anthony, Ruitenberg and Couch.


Language: en

Keywords

acute phase response; extracellular vesicles; inflammation; spinal cord injury; traumatic brain injury

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print