SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hine KA, Porter LE, Westera NJ, Alpert GP. Policing Soc. 2018; 28(5): 587-604.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/10439463.2016.1232257

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study examined variations of police use of force by applying Terrill et al.'s [(2003). A management tool for evaluating police use of force: an application of the force factor. Police quarterly, 6 (2), 150-171] adaptation of Alpert and Dunham's [(1997). The force factor: measuring police use of force relative to suspect resistance. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum] Force Factor method (where the level of force is explored relative to the level of suspect resistance) via the use of Terrill et al.'s Resistance Force Comparative Scale. Using official data from the Queensland Police Service in Australia, this study examined 202 police-citizen encounters that resulted in police use of force. The impact of individual and situational factors on officers' use of commensurate, lower, or higher relative force was explored with chi-square and multinomial logistic regression. The regression analyses found that officers' were less likely to use higher relative force with suspects who were physically aggressive and suspects with weapons. Encounters that resulted in lower relative force were more likely to involve female suspects. These findings are discussed in relation to officer preparedness and decision-making.


Language: en

Keywords

Police use of force; relative force factor; suspect resistance

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print