Citation

Pasupathi M, Wainryb C, Oldroyd K, Bourne S. Int. J. Behav. Devel. 2019; 43(6): 553-562.

Affiliation

Youth Learning Institute, Clemson University.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0165025419844023

PMID

31798196

PMCID

PMC6889871

Abstract

We evaluated whether narrating anger-provoking events promoted learning from those events, as compared with other responses to anger, and whether the effectiveness of narrative depended on age. In addition, we tested relations between anger-reduction and learning and in a subset of participants, between narrative quality and learning. 248 youth (8 to 17 years old) recalled an anger-provoking experience, and were randomly assigned to one of four activities: recalling the event a second time, narrating the event, and distraction (via video game play or conversation). Youth then recalled the event one last time, and rated the extent to which they had learned from that event. Younger children reported more learning when they had narrated their experience. Older youth reported more learning when they had narrated the event more frequently prior to participation. Stronger reductions in anger following regulation were associated with greater self-reported learning. Finally, more elaborative and less resolved narratives were associated with greater self-reported learning.

Language: en