Citation

McManus RM, Rutchick AM. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 2019; 10(3): 345-352.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1948550618755875

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

With the imminent advent of autonomous vehicles (AVs) comes a moral dilemma: How do people assign responsibility in the event of a fatal accident? AVs necessarily create conditions in which "drivers" yield agency to a machine. The current study examines how people make attributions of blame and praise in this context. Varying the features of AV technology affected how responsible a "driver" (who purchased the vehicle) is perceived to be following a deadly crash. The findings provide support for agency and commission as crucial bases of moral judgment. They also raise questions about how morally contradictory actions are perceived and underscore the need for research examining how moral responsibility is distributed among multiple potentially culpable agents. Pragmatically, these findings suggest that regulating (or declining to regulate) how AVs are programmed may strongly influence perceptions of moral and legal culpability.

Language: en