Citation

Bueso-Izquierdo N, Verdejo-Román J, Martínez-Barbero JP, Pérez-Rosillo MA, Pérez-García M, Hidalgo-Ruzzante N, Hart SD. Int. J. Forensic Ment. Health 2019; 18(3): 220-227.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Simon Fraser University - Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Publisher Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/14999013.2018.1476422

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Past research has found differences in the brain activation of batterers vs. other offenders in response to depictions of violence, but it is not known whether these functional differences are associated with structural brain abnormalities (SBAs).

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the prevalence and nature of SBAs in batterers using neuroimaging methods.

METHOD: Two neuroradiologists independently diagnosed SBAs based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans for the 21 batterers and 20 other offenders. All participants had been screened to ensure that they had no obvious brain damage secondary to neurological injury or insult, including traumatic brain injury.

RESULTS: One participant had both a major and minor SBA; 13 had one or more minor SBAs. Most were judged to be not clinically relevant.

CONCLUSION: SBAs are not strongly or specifically associated with IPV, and it is unlikely they are responsible for the differences in brain functioning between batterers and other offenders observed in past research.

Language: en

Keywords

Intimate partner violence; magnetic resonance imaging; structural brain abnormalities