Citation

Maltz M, Shinar D. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2007; 10(4): 345-357.

Affiliation

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Industrial Engineering and Management, Beer-Sheva, Israel (maltzm@bgu.ac.il)

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trf.2007.01.002

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a type of in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system (IVCAWS) under conditions of driver distraction. Forty-three participants responded to an imperfect warning system while simultaneously driving a simulator and performing a visual/cognitive task. The major concerns were whether drivers would be more inclined to rely on such a system when they are distracted by subsidiary tasks, and if this reliance would be counterproductive. We found that distracted drivers responded, by increasing their temporal headway, to the less reliable system's alarms, but the warning system at the higher reliability levels led to over reliance and ultimately to maintaining shorter headways. This study has practical implications for the use of warning systems as driving aids for drivers. Although aids may be helpful and, in many cases, the more reliable aid is preferable, in the case of distraction, drivers may misuse the aid.


Keywords: Driver distraction

Language: en