SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Taveau J, Lemkowitz S, Hochgreb S, Roekaerts D. Process Saf. Progr. 2019; 38(3): e12033.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/prs.12033

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In facilities handling combustible dusts, the isolation of propagating deflagrations requires great attention due to the potential catastrophic consequences of secondary dust explosions. While the ability of dust explosions to propagate is widely recognized, some misconceptions still exist. One of the common myths is that a dust explosion cannot propagate through small diameter pipes and that explosion isolation may not be required in that case. This article first presents a simplified theory of flame propagation in pipes. Dust explosion experiments performed in industrial-scale pipes smaller or equal to 4 in (or 100 mm) in diameter are then reviewed. The findings of the experiments are interpreted in the light of the simplified theory. Our study reveals that dust explosion propagation has been consistently observed in pipes with a diameter as small as 1 in. While the likelihood of flame propagation seems to decrease with pipe diameter and other "chemical" and "engineering" factors, it remains a realistic scenario and therefore should be addressed in the design and operation of powder handling systems. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog 38: e12033, 2019


Language: en

Keywords

deflagration; dust; explosion isolation; explosion propagation; small pipes

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print