SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Dee SJ, Cox BL, Ogle RA. Process Saf. Progr. 2019; 38(3): e12031.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/prs.12031

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Process hazard analysis is recognized by many safety professionals and regulatory groups as the key provision of a process safety management system. This analysis evaluates what can go wrong, and what safeguards are needed to prevent incidents. One challenge in process hazard analysis is the reliance on humans to determine reasonable, expected, or anticipated failure modes. The implementation of safeguards may also foster a lost sense of vulnerability to potential process upsets. These factors in combination can lead to a disregard for failure modes considered "unlikely" or even "impossible." Unfortunately, this problem is often revealed when the "impossible" leads to an incident or accident. In this article, a case study is used to motivate a discussion of incidents involving hazards that were disregarded in process hazard analysis due to their low probability, or supposed impossibility. Tools, techniques, and guidance will be discussed to improve process hazard analysis when evaluating low probability failure modes. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Process Saf Prog 38: e12031, 2019


Language: en

Keywords

hazard assessment; incident investigation; management of change

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print