SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Chen X, Wu Z, Chen W, Kang R, He X, Miao Y. Eng. Failure Anal. 2019; 99: 69-84.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, European Structural Integrity Society, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.071

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Pipeline is a safe and economical way to transport gas and oil. In the process of operation, third-party damage, corrosion destruction, design defect, misuse of factors and other unknown factors can cause pipeline failure, which pose a huge risk to life and property. To identify and develop strategies to prevent pipeline failure event, risk assessment and risk-based techniques are widely used in the oil and gas pipeline industry. However, although these methods and techniques can effectively prevent and reduce the tangible loss, i.e., human loss, production loss, asset loss and environmental loss, the intangible loss such as reputation loss is often neglected. This is not consistent with many current literature studies and actual situations. To address mentioned limitation, this article selected reputation loss indicators in pipeline failure event based on related literature and Delphi method, and the indicators are ranked by group making-decision method and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). The case study identified investor factor as dominant for reflecting reputation loss in oil and gas pipeline failure event. The indicators credit rating downgrades, falling share prices are identified as the most important for the effective improvement of reputation loss in pipeline failure event.

Keywords: Pipeline transportation


Language: en

Keywords

Delphi method; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP); Group making-decision method; Pipeline failure; Reputation loss

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print