Citation

Snow A. Criminol. Crim. Justice 2019; 19(2): 141-159.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/1748895817738556

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This article examines citizens' reactions to being issued with an on the spot penalty and the consequences this has for holding a law-abiding identity. Using mundane examples of statutory requirements regulating everyday life (motoring), it is found that people use common-sense purposive reasoning in their interpretation of law which does not match the actual black-letter law application of the specific statutes. The lack of congruence between the purposive understandings of legal requirements and the black-letter application of enforcement agencies allows citizens to maintain a moral position that is aligned with the aims of the law but not its actual requirements. This process reaffirms a belief in law-abidance even where the citizen has been found to break the law.

Language: en