Citation

Janak JC, Mazuchowski EL, Kotwal RS, Stockinger ZT, Howard JT, Butler FK, Sosnov JA, Gurney JM, Shackelford SA. Sci. Rep. 2019; 9(1): e13767.

Affiliation

Department of Defense Joint Trauma System, Defense Health Agency, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1038/s41598-019-50272-3

PMID

31551454

Abstract

A mortality review of death caused by injury requires a determination of injury survivability prior to a determination of death preventability. If injuries are nonsurvivable, only non-medical primary prevention strategies have potential to prevent the death. Therefore, objective measures are needed to empirically inform injury survivability from complex anatomic patterns of injury. As a component of injury mortality reviews, network structures show promise to objectively elucidate survivability from complex anatomic patterns of injury resulting from explosive and firearm mechanisms. In this network analysis of 5,703 critically injured combat casualties, patterns of injury among fatalities from explosive mechanisms were associated with both a higher number and severity of anatomic injuries to regions such as the extremities, abdomen, and thorax. Patterns of injuries from a firearm were more isolated to individual body regions with fatal patterns involving more severe injuries to the head and thorax. Each injury generates a specific level of risk as part of an overall anatomic pattern to inform injury survivability not always captured by traditional trauma scoring systems. Network models have potential to further elucidate differences between potentially survivable and nonsurvivable anatomic patterns of injury as part of the mortality review process relevant to improving both the military and civilian trauma care systems.

Language: en