Citation

Chapman-Schmidt B. Anti-Traffick. Rev. 2019; 12: 172-187.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women (GAATW))

DOI

10.14197/atr.2012191211

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

While the American Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017 (FOSTA) has been heavily criticised by researchers and activists for the harm it inflicts on sex workers, many of these critics nevertheless agree with the Act's goal of fighting sex trafficking online. This paper, however, argues that in American legal discourse, 'sex trafficking' refers not to human trafficking for sexual exploitation, but rather to all forms of sex work. As such, the law's punitive treatment of sex workers needs to be understood as the law's purpose, rather than an unfortunate side effect. This paper also demonstrates how the discourse of 'sex trafficking' is itself a form of epistemic violence that silences sex workers and leaves them vulnerable to abuse, with FOSTA serving to broaden the scope of this violence. The paper concludes by highlighting ways journalists and academic researchers can avoid becoming complicit in this violence.

Keywords: Human trafficking

Language: en

Keywords

governmentality; human rights; human trafficking; law enforcement; postcolonial theory; sex work