Citation

Krychiw JK, Ward-Ciesielski EF. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being 2019; 14(1): e1650585.

Affiliation

a Department of Psychology, Hofstra University , Hempstead , NY , USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Co-Action Pub.)

DOI

10.1080/17482631.2019.1650585

PMID

31401937

Abstract

Purpose: In recent decades, suicide prevention initiatives have increased substantially, yet the suicide rate has continued to rise, and suicide deaths are still generally perceived as unexpected. This study sought to identify factors that might account for this discrepancy by focusing on the exhibition of suicide warning signs. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 adults [mean age = 36 (SD = 14), 93% female] who had attempted suicide at least once in their lifetime. Results: A disconnect between participants and their environment emerged as a central theme. Many expressed ambivalence about whether they wanted others to intervene before their attempts, resulting in either expression or inhibition of warning signs. Regardless of whether they wanted their attempt to be predictable, most participants expressed disappointment if they perceived a lack of intervention before their attempt. In some cases, this disappointment exacerbated distress and may have contributed to the attempt itself. Participants also expressed difficulty disclosing their suicidal ideation to others. Thus, even if they wanted help, participants were unsure how to effectively attain it. Conclusions: Findings underscore the complexity of predicting and preventing suicide; however, engaging individuals with lived experience in these efforts facilitates greater understanding toward outreach and intervention approaches.

Language: en

Keywords

Suicide; actor-observer bias; biosocial theory; interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide