SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Appleby L, Turnbull P, Kapur N, Gunnell D, Hawton K. BMJ 2019; 366: l4745.

Affiliation

Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/bmj.l4745

PMID

31358499

Abstract

Suicide can now be concluded on “balance of probabilities”

In May 2019 the Court of Appeal in England and Wales handed down a ruling on the determination of suicide at inquest that is likely to affect the national suicide rate and influence policy priorities.1 The ruling upholds a critical decision taken in 2018 by the High Court2 that the standard of proof required for a suicide conclusion (previously verdict) should be the civil standard—balance of probabilities—rather than the previous criminal standard—beyond reasonable doubt. The lowering of the threshold is expected to lead to an increase in deaths recorded as suicide.

The standard of proof has been debated for several years. Suicide prevention charities, in particular, have campaigned for the civil standard, arguing that it will give a more accurate picture of the extent of the problem by reducing the underestimation that a higher standard makes inevitable.3 Higher figures, they believe, will also bring higher political priority. In addition, the criminal standard is widely seen as stigmatising, a …


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print