|
Citation
|
Monden KR, Sevigny M, Ketchum JM, Charlifue S, Severe E, Tefertiller C, Berliner J, Coker J, Taylor HB, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Morse LR. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub. |
|
Affiliation
|
Rocky Mountain Regional Spinal Injury System, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colorado, United States of America; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America. |
|
Abstract
|
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between insurance provider and reported assistive technology (AT) use to access computers and electronic devices one year after sustaining tetraplegia.
DESIGN: Multi-center cross-sectional study. SETTING: Participants enrolled in the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) National Database. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. PARTICIPANTS: 498 men and women with tetraplegia enrolled in the SCIMS National Database were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary study outcome was the use of AT when operating a computer or other mobile electronic device. The primary predictor was the subject's principal health insurance provider, which was grouped into the three categories: government (Medicare, Medicaid, and other government), private (private insurance, private funds, and other), and Worker's Compensation.
RESULTS: Overall, 34.7% of participants reported using AT to access computers and electronic devices.
RESULTS of logistic regression analysis revealed sex, injury level, injury completeness, self-perceived health status, and 12-month history of pressure ulcer were all significantly associated with AT use. After adjusting for these factors, participants with Worker's Compensation were more likely to report AT use than individuals with either government or private insurance.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant technological advances, AT is not readily available to the people that might benefit most from its use.
FINDINGS from the present study are the first to shed light on AT funding sources and reveal that individuals with Worker's Compensation are more likely use AT than individuals with either government or private insurance. Additional work focused on AT use and functional outcomes is needed to assess the impact of barriers to use. Collectively, this work may inform insurers of the importance of having AT available for this unique population to potentially improve quality of life and participation.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Language: en |