Citation

Nowrouzi-Kia B, Chai E, Usuba K, Nowrouzi-Kia B, Casole J. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2019; 10(3): 99-110.

Affiliation

Special Education Department, Loretto College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, NIOC Health Organization)

DOI

10.15171/ijoem.2019.1573

PMID

31325293

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Workplace violence (WPV) in the health care sector remains a prominent, under-reported global occupational hazard and public health issue.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the types and prevalence of WPV among doctors.

METHODS: Primary papers on WPV in medicine were identified through a literature search in 4 health databases (Ovid Medline, EMBASE, PsychoINFO and CINAHL). The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for the mapping and identification of records. To assess the studies included in our review, we used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme cohort review checklist and the Risk of Bias Assessment.

RESULTS: 13 out of 2154 articles retrieved were reviewed. Factors outlining physician WPV included (1) working in remote health care areas, (2) understaffing, (3) mental/emotional stress of patients/visitors, (4) insufficient security, and (5) lacking preventative measures. The results of 6 studies were combined in a meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of WPV was 69% (95% CI 58% to 78%).

CONCLUSION: The impact of WPV on health care institutions is profound and far-reaching; it is quite common among physicians. Therefore, steps must be taken to promote an organizational culture where there are measures to protect and promote the well-being of doctors.

Language: en

Keywords

Meta-analysis [publication type]; Occupational medicine; Physicians; Systematic review [publication type]; Workplace violence