SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

O'Brien JE. J. Hum. Traffick. 2019; 5(2): 91-108.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/23322705.2017.1410415

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Domestic minor sex trafficking (DMST) is one of the most prevalent yet hidden forms of child abuse in the United States. DMST victims are diverse in age, race, and socioeconomic status. Many DMST victims are involved in state-level systems including the child welfare and/or juvenile justice system. State-level systems are federally mandated to identify children who are at risk or survivors of DMST. Unfortunately, DMST victim/survivor identification is inconsistent and often ineffective and is based on service providers' and DMST victims'/survivors' de facto definitions of DMST. This study presents exploratory, qualitative findings regarding service provider and DMST victim/survivor de facto definitions of DMST. In addition, it explores how these definitions are different from and/or similar to extant federal and state legal definitions. Content analysis revealed three key qualitative themes, including force/fraud/coercion, commercialization, and DMST as a form of child sexual abuse. Importantly, DMST victim/survivor and service provider definitions of DMST are different, which may be contributing to ineffective DMST victim/survivor identification protocols. Furthermore, there are several important differences between participants' definitions of DMST and extant federal and state legal definitions. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.


Language: en

Keywords

child sexual abuse; DMST definitions; Domestic minor sex trafficking; victim/survivor identification

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print