SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

van der Heijden SMT, Prins MR, van der Wurff P. Mil. Med. Res. 2019; 6(1): e21.

Affiliation

Institute for Human Movement Studies, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, 3584CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. P.van.der.Wurff@mrcdoorn.nl.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group - BMC)

DOI

10.1186/s40779-019-0212-y

PMID

31296263

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the military, insufficient postural stability is a risk factor for developing lower extremity injuries. Postural stability training programs are effective in preventing these injuries. However, an objective method for the measurement of postural stability in servicemen is lacking. The primary objective of this study was to assess the influence of the number of repetitions, different foot positions and real-time visual feedback on postural stability, as well as their effects on the intrasession reliability of postural stability measurements in servicemen. The secondary objective was to assess the concurrent validity of the measurements.

METHODS: Twenty healthy servicemen between 20 and 50 years of age and in active duty were eligible for this quantitative, cross-sectional study. The measurements took place on a force plate, measuring the mean velocity of the center of pressure. The participants were asked to stand as still as possible in three different foot positions (wide stance, small stance, and on one leg), five times each for 45 s each time, and the measurements were performed with and without real-time visual feedback.

RESULTS: We observed a significant main effect of foot position (P < 0.001), but not of visual feedback (P = 0.119) or repetition number (P = 0.915). Postural stability decreased in the more challenging foot positions. The ICC estimates varied from 0.809 (one repetition in wide stance) to 0.985 (five repetitions on one leg). The common variance (R2) between different foot positions without feedback varied between 0.008 (wide stance) and 0.412.

CONCLUSIONS: To yield reliable data, wide-stance measurements should be conducted three times, and small-stance measurements and measurements on one leg should be conducted two times. The scores of a measurement in a particular foot position cannot predict the scores of measurements in other foot positions.


Language: en

Keywords

Center of Pressure; Concurrent validity; Intrasession reliability; Postural stability; Servicemen

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print