SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Pichiule Castañeda M, Gandarillas Grande A, Pires Alcaide M, Lasheras Lozano L, Ordobás Gavín M. Gac. Sanit. 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Vernacular Title

Validación de la versión corta del Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) en población general.

Affiliation

Servicio de Epidemiología, Subdirección General de Epidemiología, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Sanidad, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, España.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.04.006

PMID

31213324

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a concurrent validation of the short version of the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST), used to detect intimate partner violence, estimating the validity indexes in the general population.

METHOD: The information source was the third Intimate partner violence survey in the Region of Madrid (Spain) conducted on women aged 18-70 in 2014. As the gold standard we used the definition of intimate partner violence based on a 26- question survey. The short version of WAST includes two questions with three possible answers. The prevalence of intimate partner violence and the validity indexes were calculated and compared according to two scoring criteria with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS: The response rate was 60.0%, and 2979 surveys were analysed. The prevalence of intimate partner violence was 7.6% (95%CI: 6.6-8.5). We showed 21.1% (95%CI: 19.6-22.5) positive test results according to WAST criterion 1 and 11.0% (95%CI: 9.9-12.1) according to criterion 2. Criterion 2 presented higher overall efficiency of the test (81.5% [95%CI: 80.1-82.9] criterion 1 vs. 88.8% [95%CI: 87.7-89.9] criterion 2). The best indexes were obtained in women ≥30 years old.

CONCLUSIONS: The short version of the WAST showed acceptable validity indexes for use as a screening tool of intimate partner violence in the general population. We recommend using scoring criterion 2 to estimate prevalence of intimate partner violence in surveys on the general population.

Copyright © 2019 SESPAS. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.


Language: es

Keywords

Cribado poblacional; Encuestas epidemiológicas; Epidemiological surveys; Estudios de validación; Intimate partner violence; Population screening; Validation studies; Violencia de pareja

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print