SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Mennicke A, Langenderfer-Magruder L, MacConnie L. J. Fam. Violence 2019; 34(1): 47-54.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s10896-018-9991-2

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The present study explored the perceptions of workers who provide intimate partner violence (IPV) services regarding child welfare workers' IPV assessment and referral processes. Data from four focus groups was interrogated to find common themes. A total of 27 individuals participated in the focus groups, working in the community, shelters, and prisons/jails. Participants primarily expressed concerns regarding child welfare workers' practices. IPV providers perceived child welfare workers as incompetent in performing IPV assessments and making referrals. IPV workers also perceived that some child welfare workers engaged in dismissive, manipulative, or coercive behaviors when working with IPV victims. While the present findings are not generalizable, they speak to the tension frequently noted between victim services and child welfare. Child welfare agencies should consider ongoing, trauma-informed training for IPV assessment to help increase worker self-efficacy in performing these tasks. Local, interdisciplinary trainings including both IPV and child welfare providers may be particularly useful to promote better understanding of each provider's role in cases with co-occurring IPV and child maltreatment concerns, which may help to reduce tensions between the intersecting service systems.


Language: en

Keywords

Assessment; Child welfare; Intimate partner violence; Referral; Screening

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print